Propertius 3.1.27.
The paradosis of Propertius 3.1.27: Idaeum Simoenta Iouis (cunabula parui) is either lacunose (N) or nonsensical (all other manuscripts). Gustav Wolff 's celebrated. . . cum prole Scamandro runs against objections in terms of paleographical verisimilitude, intertextual relevance, and conformity with...
| Publicado en: | Mnemosyne Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 417 - 432 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=42316432&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 42316432 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267074 MNM jtl: Mnemosyne issn: 00267074 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2009 vid: 62 iid: 3 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 42316432 10.1163/156852509X384211 ppf: 417 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 186KB tig: atl: Propertius 3.1.27. aug: au: Dominicy, Marc affil: Université libre de Bruxelles, Laboratoire de Linguistique Textuelle et de Pragmatique, Cognitive, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 50, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium su: Literary research Medieval manuscripts Intertextuality Intertextual analysis Facsimiles of manuscripts sug: subj: Literary research Medieval manuscripts Intertextuality Intertextual analysis Facsimiles of manuscripts keyword: HOMERIC SOURCES manuscript tradition PETRARCH'S EXEMPLAR Propertius 3.1.27 ab: The paradosis of Propertius 3.1.27: Idaeum Simoenta Iouis (cunabula parui) is either lacunose (N) or nonsensical (all other manuscripts). Gustav Wolff 's celebrated. . . cum prole Scamandro runs against objections in terms of paleographical verisimilitude, intertextual relevance, and conformity with elegiac diction. This paper provides arguments in favor of. . . ruisse in pabula parta, which echoes two Homeric passages (Il. 5.773-7, 12.19-22) while pointing, intertextually, to Lucretius and the archaic forms of epic poetry. Paleographically, ruisse in pabula parta can easily have yielded Iouis cunabula parua. Moreover, Petrarch's use of cunabula parua in 1342 suggests that his (lost) copy of Propertius, and the (now incomplete) manuscript A from which it was made in 1333, bore parua. If parui is a later correction, the standard theory, according to which the manuscript tradition of Propertius divides into the N and A families, is vindicated against the alternative theory recently put forward by James L. Butrica and Stephen J. Heyworth. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Mnemosyne is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Mnemosyne holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|