The Notion of Pseudo-Argument in Perelman’s Thought.

According to Perelman ( Rhétoriques, Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles, : 80), a pseudo-argument is an argument that is supposed to be convincing from a given audience viewpoint, while it is not from another audience viewpoint. Such a claim raises the traditional problem of the boundaries between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Argumentation Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 351 - 360
Autor principal: Danblon, Emmanuelle
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=43168848&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 43168848
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0920427X
        L8J
      jtl: Argumentation
      issn: 0920427X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2009
      vid: 23
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        43168848
        10.1007/s10503-009-9146-y
      ppf: 351
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The Notion of Pseudo-Argument in Perelman’s Thought.
      aug:
        au: Danblon, Emmanuelle
        affil: FNRS, Free University of Brussels, 1050 Brussels Belgium
      su:
        Pseudocode (Computer program language)
        Belief & doubt
        Audiences
        Persuasion (Psychology)
        Perelman, Chaïm
      sug:
        subj:
          Pseudocode (Computer program language)
          Belief & doubt
          Audiences
          Persuasion (Psychology)
          Perelman, Chaïm
      keyword:
        "As if"
        “As if”
        Conviction
        Counter intuitive beliefs
        Perelman
        Persuasion
        Pseudo argument
        Universal audience
      ab: According to Perelman ( Rhétoriques, Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles, : 80), a pseudo-argument is an argument that is supposed to be convincing from a given audience viewpoint, while it is not from another audience viewpoint. Such a claim raises the traditional problem of the boundaries between the well known “convince versus persuade” dichotomy. This paper aims at investigating it from a contemporary rhetorical and argumentative perspective which will take into account the fictional dimension of persuasion. In this perspective, it will be claimed that the notion of an “as if” argument better fits to some rhetorical phenomena.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2009
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N