Augustine on the Impossibility of Teaching.

The information-transference account of teaching takes it to be a process in which information is transferred from one person's mind to another's. Augustine argues that this is impossible, since in order to understand something the person who understands must come to see why it is so, and that is an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Metaphilosophy Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 179 - 196
Autor principal: King, Peter
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul98
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4336513&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 4336513
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00261068
        9OM
      jtl: Metaphilosophy
      issn: 00261068
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul98
      vid: 29
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        4336513
        10.1111/1467-9973.00090
      ppf: 179
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 71KB
      tig:
        atl: Augustine on the Impossibility of Teaching.
      aug:
        au: King, Peter
      su:
        Teaching
        Learning
        Questioning
        Methodology
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Teaching
          Learning
          Questioning
          Methodology
          Philosophy
      ab: The information-transference account of teaching takes it to be a process in which information is transferred from one person's mind to another's. Augustine argues that this is impossible, since in order to understand something the person who understands must come to see why it is so, and that is an internal episode of awareness that isn't caused by an outside source. Augustine's insight here is contrasted with the contemporary view, following Wittgenstein, that learning is a matter of conformity to rules (public norms). The case is made that teaching and learning pose philosophical problems that contemporary theories don't address, and a brief examination of Searle's Chinese Room example suggests that its plausibility derives from Augustine's insight that mere rule-following behavior isn't enough to explain the phenomenon of understanding at the heart of knowledge. A reconstruction of Augustine's epistemological claims, divorced from his discredited views in the philosophy of language, is also provided.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Metaphilosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Metaphilosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1998
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N