Proceduralizing Regulation: Part I.
The solution frequently being advocated to a range of regulatory and indeed constitutional questions is to devise procedures for participation, for democratization. The aim of this article is to explore just what the shift to procedures and to participation might involve. The article will appear in...
| Publicado en: | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 20; no. 4 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Winter2000
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4336922&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 4336922 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01436503 BJ4 jtl: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies issn: 01436503 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Winter2000 vid: 20 iid: 4 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 4336922 10.1093/ojls/20.4.597 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 100KB tig: atl: Proceduralizing Regulation: Part I. aug: au: BLACK, JULIA su: Legal procedure Democracy sug: subj: Legal procedure Democracy ab: The solution frequently being advocated to a range of regulatory and indeed constitutional questions is to devise procedures for participation, for democratization. The aim of this article is to explore just what the shift to procedures and to participation might involve. The article will appear in this Journal in two parts. The first part distinguishes between two possible forms of proceduralization: 'thin' proceduralization, based on a liberal model of democracy, and 'thick' proceduralization, based on deliberative models of democracy. In exploring the latter, the article takes as its starting point the work of Habermas. Given the richness and complexity of his argument the development of the notion of thick proceduralization necessarily occurs in part through a critique of his work, for it is argued that although Habermas may provide an important starting point, his work cannot also be the end point of the debate. The second part of the article will discuss the modifications that may need to be made for 'thick' proceduralization to be adopted as a regulatory strategy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 Oxford University Press. item: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2000 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|