PEGS, BOARDS, AND RELATIVISTIC PERDURANCE.
In an earlier work I developed an argument favoring one view of persistence (viz., perdurance) over its rivals, based on considerations of the relativity of three-dimensional spatial shapes of physical objects in Minkowski spacetime. The argument has since come under criticism (in the works of Theod...
| Publicado en: | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 90; no. 2; pp. 167 - 176 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=43500078&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 43500078 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02790750 PHZ jtl: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly issn: 02790750 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2009 vid: 90 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 43500078 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01334.x ppf: 167 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 170KB tig: atl: PEGS, BOARDS, AND RELATIVISTIC PERDURANCE. aug: au: BALASHOV, YURI affil: Department of Philosophy University of Georgia su: Personality (Theory of knowledge) Theory of self-knowledge Self (Philosophy) Identity (Philosophical concept) Meaning (Philosophy) Social psychology sug: subj: Personality (Theory of knowledge) Theory of self-knowledge Self (Philosophy) Identity (Philosophical concept) Meaning (Philosophy) Social psychology ab: In an earlier work I developed an argument favoring one view of persistence (viz., perdurance) over its rivals, based on considerations of the relativity of three-dimensional spatial shapes of physical objects in Minkowski spacetime. The argument has since come under criticism (in the works of Theodore Sider, Kristie Miller, Ian Gibson, Oliver Pooley, and Thomas Sattig). Two related topics, explanatory virtues and explanatory relevance, are central to these critical discussions. In this paper I deal with these topics directly and respond to my critics by offering a new perspective on the issue. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Pacific Philosophical Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|