Liberating Ecological Reason Through Interdisciplinarity.

The theory and practice of ecological reason have consistently suffered various shortcomings, versions of anthropocentrism and holism prominent among them. Even definitions of ecological reason that rely on philosophically informed policy studies and that explicitly take the functional and substanti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Metaphilosophy Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 186 - 209
Autor principal: Beggs, Donald
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul99
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4369963&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 4369963
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00261068
        9OM
      jtl: Metaphilosophy
      issn: 00261068
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul99
      vid: 30
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        4369963
        10.1111/1467-9973.00121
      ppf: 186
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 79KB
      tig:
        atl: Liberating Ecological Reason Through Interdisciplinarity.
      aug:
        au: Beggs, Donald
      su:
        Reasoning
        Ecology
        Interdisciplinary approach to knowledge
      sug:
        subj:
          Reasoning
          Ecology
          Interdisciplinary approach to knowledge
      ab: The theory and practice of ecological reason have consistently suffered various shortcomings, versions of anthropocentrism and holism prominent among them. Even definitions of ecological reason that rely on philosophically informed policy studies and that explicitly take the functional and substantive moments of reason into account have not escaped these problems. An account of interdisciplinarity can shed light on how these intractable problems arise, since many of them fail to build interdisciplinarity as such sufficiently into the definition of ecological reason. Genuine interdisciplinarity, distinguished from both multidisciplinarity and metadisciplinarity, can thus be seen to be necessary (not sufficient) to liberate ecological reason and to illuminate its theory and practice for late moderns.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Metaphilosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Metaphilosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1999
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N