The Linguistic Case for the Aiolian Migration Reconsidered.

Ascribing the presence of speakers of Lesbian in the northeast Aegean during historical times to the migration of Aiolian tribes from mainland Greece receives no support from linguistics. Migration is not the only or even primary way in which languages and dialects may spread. Moreover, on reexamina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Hesperia Vol. 77; no. 3; pp. 431 - 465
Autor principal: Parker, Holt N
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American School of Classical Studies at Athens Jul2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Ascribing the presence of speakers of Lesbian in the northeast Aegean during historical times to the migration of Aiolian tribes from mainland Greece receives no support from linguistics. Migration is not the only or even primary way in which languages and dialects may spread. Moreover, on reexamination, the idea of an Aiolic dialect group falls apart. Boiotian, separated by the First Compensatory Lengthening from Lesbian and Thessalian, appears as a conservative dialect, most closely related to West Greek. In turn, Lesbian and Thessalian are both archaic branches of Greek that share no demonstrable common innovations. They are best viewed as two separate relic areas of a relatively unaltered early Greek.