Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception.
Neuropsychological findings used to motivate the “two visual systems” hypothesis have been taken to endanger a pair of widely accepted claims about spatial representation in conscious visual experience. The first is the claim that visual experience represents 3-D space around the perceiver using an...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy & Phenomenological Research Vol. 79; no. 2; pp. 423 - 461 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Sep2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=44133356&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 44133356 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318205 PPO jtl: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research issn: 00318205 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2009 vid: 79 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 44133356 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00284.x ppf: 423 ppct: 38 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 250KB tig: atl: Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception. aug: au: BRISCOE, ROBERT affil: Ohio University su: Neuropsychological tests Egoism Space perception Consciousness Agnosia Optical illusions sug: subj: Neuropsychological tests Egoism Space perception Consciousness Agnosia Optical illusions ab: Neuropsychological findings used to motivate the “two visual systems” hypothesis have been taken to endanger a pair of widely accepted claims about spatial representation in conscious visual experience. The first is the claim that visual experience represents 3-D space around the perceiver using an egocentric frame of reference. The second is the claim that there is a constitutive link between the spatial contents of visual experience and the perceiver’s bodily actions. In this paper, I review and assess three main sources of evidence for the two visual systems hypothesis. I argue that the best interpretation of the evidence is in fact consistent with both claims. I conclude with some brief remarks on the relation between visual consciousness and rational agency. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Phenomenological Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|