Umbanda and Hybridity.

Scholars of religion continue to talk of syncretism where their colleagues have moved on to talk of hybridity. This paper reviews critiques of the latter concept and argues that “hybridity” can be a useful concept, but only if further specified. I follow Peter Wade in distinguishing between hybridit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Numen: International Review for the History of Religions Vol. 56; no. 5; pp. 545 - 578
Autor principal: Engler, Steven
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=44649706&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 44649706
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00295973
        C4J
      jtl: Numen: International Review for the History of Religions
      issn: 00295973
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2009
      vid: 56
      iid: 5
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        44649706
        10.1163/002959709X12469430260084
      ppf: 545
      ppct: 33
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 185KB
      tig:
        atl: Umbanda and Hybridity.
      aug:
        au: Engler, Steven
        affil: Department of Humanities, Mount Royal College, Calgary, T3E 6K6, Canada;, Email: sengler@mtroyal.ca
      su:
        Cultural fusion
        Syncretism (Religion)
        Umbanda (Religion)
        Candomblé (Religion)
        Religion
        Brazil
      sug:
        subj:
          Brazil
          Cultural fusion
          Syncretism (Religion)
          Umbanda (Religion)
          Candomblé (Religion)
          Religion
      keyword:
        BRAZIL
        CANDOMBLÉ
        HYBRIDITY
        KARDECISM
        SYNCRETISM
        UMBANDA
      ab: Scholars of religion continue to talk of syncretism where their colleagues have moved on to talk of hybridity. This paper reviews critiques of the latter concept and argues that “hybridity” can be a useful concept, but only if further specified. I follow Peter Wade in distinguishing between hybridity of origin (the combination of pre-existing forms), and hybridity of encounter (the result of diasporic movements). I propose a third type, hybridity of refraction, in order to highlight the manner in which religious or cultural phenomena refract social tensions within a specific nation or society, resulting in a spectrum of ritual, doctrinal and/or religious forms. The typology is not meant to be complete or mutually exclusive: it suggests the value of adopting distinct, potentially overlapping, perspectives on hybridization. I illustrate the heuristic value of this approach with the case of Umbanda, a twentieth-century Brazilian religion.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Numen: International Review for the History of Religions is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Numen: International Review for the History of Religions
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2009
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N