Externalities as Commodities: Comment.

In a recent issue of May, 1974, "Review," Robert Meyer employed the tools of non-linear programming in an attempt to refute a conclusion of his 1967 externality article which had once before been the basis for a discussion Meyer's article showed that "a per unit tax which has the twin objectives of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Economic Review Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 451 - 454
Autor principal: Dolbear Jr., F. Trenery
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Economic Association Jun74
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4497084&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 4497084
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00028282
        AER
      jtl: American Economic Review
      issn: 00028282
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun74
      vid: 64
      iid: 3
      pid: 22
      pub: American Economic Association
    artinfo:
      ui: 4497084
      ppf: 451
      ppct: 3
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Externalities as Commodities: Comment.
      aug:
        au: Dolbear Jr., F. Trenery
        affil: Brandeis University.
      su:
        Nonlinear programming
        Tax expenditures
        Externalities
        Mathematical programming
        Linear programming
        Taxation
        Subsidies
        Public spending
        Endowments
      sug:
        subj:
          Nonlinear programming
          Tax expenditures
          Externalities
          Mathematical programming
          Linear programming
          Taxation
          Subsidies
          Public spending
          Endowments
      ab: In a recent issue of May, 1974, "Review," Robert Meyer employed the tools of non-linear programming in an attempt to refute a conclusion of his 1967 externality article which had once before been the basis for a discussion Meyer's article showed that "a per unit tax which has the twin objectives of keeping an individual on his starting point indifference curve and attaining a Pareto optimum is not, in general, possible." In other words, simultaneous achievement of exact compensation and Pareto optimality requires a tax scheme which is more complicated than a constant per unit tax or subsidy. At first glance Meyer's programming formulation seems to be capable of yielding constant per unit taxes or subsidies which do result in the simultaneous achievement of Pareto optimality and exact compensation. However, a second look reveals that Meyer's scheme requires something more than constant per unit tax-subsidy payments, for example, lump sum transfers. In the standard Pigouvian treatment with compensation as a goal, individual begin with certain endowments of factors or goods, and a legal system which constraints the use of the goods.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1974
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N