Attackability.

As its title indicates, this essay undertakes to conceptualize and to critique attackability—the legitimating logic yet also the underlying weakness of pre-emptive warfare. The recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have tended to script an inevitability of imperial attack in terms of the putative enem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Canadian Review of American Studies Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 299 - 320
Autor principal: Simpson, Mark
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Toronto Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=45066479&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 45066479
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00077720
        CRA
      jtl: Canadian Review of American Studies
      issn: 00077720
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2009
      vid: 39
      iid: 3
      pid: 678
      pub: University of Toronto Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        45066479
        10.3138/cras.39.3.299
      ppf: 299
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 118KB
      tig:
        atl: Attackability.
      aug:
        au: Simpson, Mark
      su:
        Preemptive attack (Military science)
        Iraq War, 2003-2011
        Military science
        Film criticism
        Jarhead (Film)
        Mendes, Sam, 1965-
        Lessons of Darkness (Film)
        Herzog, Werner, 1942-
      sug:
        subj:
          Preemptive attack (Military science)
          Iraq War, 2003-2011
          Military science
          Film criticism
          Jarhead (Film)
          Mendes, Sam, 1965-
          Lessons of Darkness (Film)
          Herzog, Werner, 1942-
      keyword:
        attackability
        guerre en Iraq
        guerre par anticipation
        Iraq war
        Jarhead
        Lessons of Darkness
        possibilité d’attaque
        pre-emptive warfare
      ab: As its title indicates, this essay undertakes to conceptualize and to critique attackability—the legitimating logic yet also the underlying weakness of pre-emptive warfare. The recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have tended to script an inevitability of imperial attack in terms of the putative enemy's incapacity (whether because of enmity, or vulnerability) to avoid being attacked. Yet to the extent that the term “attack” bears within it a sense of attachment, this understanding of warfare involves not just a means of laying claim or seizing control or obliterating, but also an interminable failure to let go, a corrosive compulsion to hold on. The argument investigates the significance of such debilitating dynamics with reference to two films that address, in strikingly different ways, the first US-Iraq war: Sam Mendes's Jarhead (2005) and Werner Herzog's Lessons of Darkness (1992).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Canadian Review of American Studies is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Canadian Review of American Studies
      holder: University of Toronto Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2009
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N