Predicting Prejudice from Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: A Multiple-Regression Approach.

In a study designed to investigate the respective roles of religious fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism as predictors of prejudice against racial minorities and homosexuals, participants (47 males, 91 females) responded to a series of questionnaire measures of these constructs. Data were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (Wiley-Blackwell) Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Autores principales: Laythe, Brian, Finkel, Deborah, Kirkpatrick, Lee A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:In a study designed to investigate the respective roles of religious fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism as predictors of prejudice against racial minorities and homosexuals, participants (47 males, 91 females) responded to a series of questionnaire measures of these constructs. Data were analyzed using multiple regression. Consistent with previous research, authoritarianism was a significant and strong positive predictor of both forms of prejudice. With authoritarianism statistically controlled, however, fundamentalism emerged as a significant negative predictor of racial prejudice but a positive predictor of homosexual prejudice. In a second study, we conducted parallel multiple regressions using the correlations from two previously published studies. The Study 1 results were replicated exactly, except that fundamentalism was a nonsignificant predictor of homosexual prejudice. We interpret the results as evidence that Christian fundamentalism consists of a second major component other than authoritarianism--related to Christian belief content--that is inversely related to some forms of prejudice (including racial prejudice) but not others (e.g., homosexual prejudice).