TRINARĖ DIALOGO STRUKTŪRA FENOMENOLOGINIU POŽIŪRIU.
The thematization of the phenomenological structure of dialogue is presented in the article. It starts with the critique of dialogue as a binomial relation. Based on Husserl's, Waldenfels' and Mickunas' analyses of intentional consciousness and intersubjectivity, the author shows that there is a thi...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 76; pp. 86 - 99 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=45126450&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 45126450 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2009 vid: 76 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 45126450 10.15388/Problemos.2009.0.1940 ppf: 86 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 544KB tig: atl: TRINARĖ DIALOGO STRUKTŪRA FENOMENOLOGINIU POŽIŪRIU. aug: au: Gutauskas, Mintautas affil: Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos katedra Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius su: Dialogue Phenomenology Intersubjectivity Interpersonal communication Common sense Self-perception sug: subj: Dialogue Phenomenology Intersubjectivity Interpersonal communication Common sense Self-perception keyword: intersubjectivity Mickunas phenomenology Waldenfels Dialogas fenomenologija intersubjektyvumas Mickūnas Waldenfels ab: The thematization of the phenomenological structure of dialogue is presented in the article. It starts with the critique of dialogue as a binomial relation. Based on Husserl's, Waldenfels' and Mickunas' analyses of intentional consciousness and intersubjectivity, the author shows that there is a third linking member -- subject matter -- in every I-Thou binomial relationship. It is the subject matter which the conceptions of Buber and levinas try to eliminate as a non-dialogical aspect. aim of this critical research is not to proceed to the analysis of dialogue as mutual understanding or rational communication, but to grope those planes of the subject matter which are closest to dialogical relationship. the author elucidates the specific character of percepting Thou in dialogical relationship. The significance of the Other's presence in a dialogue and the constitution of polycentric space are investigated. the structure of addressing is described in the aspect of perception. It is also critically revised whether the problem of the cognition of the Other is significant for dialogue theory. the author is looking for the principles that enable the constitution of common sense. He considers that the main principle for the constitution of common sense is "the connection of fulfilment" (Erfüllungszusammenhang), which is disclosed on the ground of Husserl's notion of filling the empty intentions (Erfüllung der leeren Intentionen). The self-perception in a dialogue is investigated in the aspect of the subject matter. Finally, the conclusion is drawn that the trinomial pattern of dialogue enables us to avoid the extreme reductions of a dialogue to a binomial relationship or rational communication and to present the universal structure of the dialogue in the aspect of a corporeal face-to-face contact and perception. Straipsnyje pateikiama fenomenologinė dialogo struktūros tematizacija. Atspirties taškas yra dialogo kaip binarinio santykio kritika. E. Remiantis Husserlio, B. Waldenfelso ir A. Mickūno sąmonės intencionalumo ir intersubjektyvumo analize, siekiama parodyti, kad bet kokiuose binariniuose Aš-Tu santykiuose visuomet figūruoja trečiasis narys -- tam tikras dalykas, kurį bando eliminuoti M. Buberio ir E. Levino koncepcijos kaip nedialogiškumo požymį. Straipsnyje siekiama ne pereiti prie dialogo kaip susikalbėjimo ar racionalios komunikacijos analizės, bet apčiuopti arčiausiai dialoginio santykio esančias dalykiškumo plotmes. Aiškinamasi Tu suvokimo specifika dialoginiame santykyje. Nagrinėjama kito esaties reikšmė policentrinės erdvės steigičiai. Aprašoma kreipimosi struktūra suvokimo aspektu. Kritiškai peržiūrima kito pažinimo problemos reikšmė dialogo teorijai. Ieškoma bendros prasmės steigimosi principų. Pagrindiniu bendros prasmės teigimosi principu laikomas „išpildymo sąryšis" (Erfüllungszusammenhang), kuris atskleidžiamas remiantis E. Husserlio pateikta tuščių sąmonės intencijų (Erfüllung der leeren Intentionen) išpildymo samprata. Nagrinėjama savivoka dialoge dalykiškumo aspektu. Galiausiai daroma išvada, kad tik trinaris dialogo modelis leidžia išvengti dialogo redukcijų kraštutinumų -- arba binarinio santykio, arba racionalios komunikacijos -- ir taip pateikti universalią dialogo struktūrą kūniškos akistatos ir suvokimo aspektu. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|