Federal Aid to the States: An Analytical Examination of the Alternatives.

Numerous suggestions have been made for increasing Federal Government assistance to the states in different ways in dealing with pressing domestic welfare and developmental programs. At the same time, many drawbacks and disadvantages of each of these alternatives have been identified, with the resul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Economics & Sociology Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 367 - 384
Autor principal: Raymond, Richard
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct69
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4512723&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 4512723
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00029246
        AES
      jtl: American Journal of Economics & Sociology
      issn: 00029246
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct69
      vid: 28
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui: 4512723
      ppf: 367
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Federal Aid to the States: An Analytical Examination of the Alternatives.
      aug:
        au: Raymond, Richard
        affil: Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
      su:
        Federal aid
        Federal government
        Public welfare
        State governments
        Domestic economic assistance
        Government aid
      sug:
        subj:
          Federal aid
          Federal government
          Public welfare
          State governments
          Domestic economic assistance
          Government aid
      ab: Numerous suggestions have been made for increasing Federal Government assistance to the states in different ways in dealing with pressing domestic welfare and developmental programs. At the same time, many drawbacks and disadvantages of each of these alternatives have been identified, with the result that no single approach has obtained general support. The purpose of this article is to contribute to breaking the deadlock by arraying and objectively comparing the various alternative approaches to what might be described as a revised fiscal federalism. Hence, this study of the policy mix of federal aid to state and local governments attempts to achieve two objectives: (1) to examine the case for increased federal financial assistance to state governments and their subdivisions; and (2) to analyze as objectively as possible the major alternative ways of distributing the aid. The foregoing analysis does not come up with a clear-cut answer as to which single federal aid approach is most desirable. Block grants with an equalization feature yield the greatest amount of income redistribution in favor of the low-income areas. However, tax credits and tax sharing, on the basis of the recent allocation patterns of state budgets, might tend to result in larger expenditures for welfare, health, and similar investments in human capital with an especial emphasis on the groups at the lowest end of the income class distribution.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1969
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N