COMMUNICATIONS.
The article presents the usefulness of secondary literature to a researcher in the field of labor history and advocates the wrong picturization of Daniel De Leon, a Marxist in the journal labor history. The article points out that, anyone familiar with the secondary literature can say that all of th...
| Publicado en: | Labor History Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 309 - 319 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Spring75
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4556479&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 4556479 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0023656X LAH jtl: Labor History issn: 0023656X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Spring75 vid: 16 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 4556479 10.1080/00236567508584339 ppf: 309 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: COMMUNICATIONS. aug: au: Seretan, L. Glen Rich, Jacob C. affil: Lecturer, Department of History, University of Toronto. su: Socialism Labor movement Writing De Leon, Daniel, 1852-1914 Working class Political philosophy Capitalism United States sug: subj: United States Socialism Labor movement Writing De Leon, Daniel, 1852-1914 Working class Political philosophy Capitalism ab: The article presents the usefulness of secondary literature to a researcher in the field of labor history and advocates the wrong picturization of Daniel De Leon, a Marxist in the journal labor history. The article points out that, anyone familiar with the secondary literature can say that all of the sources mentioned in the piece are well-known and have been utilized widely by researchers for a number of years. Historians have not shown sufficient appreciation of Mr. Daniel De Leon's services to the labor movement and have given too much credence to his critics and opponents. The charge that De Leon was a strikebreaker is a serious one and should have definite documentary verification. The testimony by De Leon's bitter opponents that he was a strikebreaker is not sufficient, for denunciatory epithets were common in cases of jurisdictional labor rivalry. De Leon stressed the futility of political action alone, leaving the capitalist class in control of the economy, by which it could lock out the working class from its means of livelihood. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1975 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|