The Reliability of Health Risk Appraisals: A Field Trial of Four Instruments.

A field trial was conducted to evaluate the reliability of four widely used health risk appraisals (HRAs). A total of 338 randomly selected adults aged 25 to 65 years residing in the Boston metropolitan area completed an HRA on two occasions seven in 12 weeks apart. Test-retest reliability was asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Public Health Vol. 79; no. 12; pp. 1603 - 1608
Autores principales: Smith, Kevin W., McKinlay, Sonja M., McKinlay, John B.
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: American Public Health Association Dec1989
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=4687249&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 4687249
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00900036
        APH
      jtl: American Journal of Public Health
      issn: 00900036
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec1989
      vid: 79
      iid: 12
      pid: 44
      pub: American Public Health Association
      place: Washington, District of Columbia
    artinfo:
      ui:
        4687249
        4687249
        10.2105/AJPH.79.12.1603
        4687249
      ppf: 1603
      ppct: 5
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The Reliability of Health Risk Appraisals: A Field Trial of Four Instruments.
      aug:
        au:
          Smith, Kevin W.
          McKinlay, Sonja M.
          McKinlay, John B.
        affil: American Institutes for Research, Watertown
      sug:
      ab: A field trial was conducted to evaluate the reliability of four widely used health risk appraisals (HRAs). A total of 338 randomly selected adults aged 25 to 65 years residing in the Boston metropolitan area completed an HRA on two occasions seven in 12 weeks apart. Test-retest reliability was assessed by comparing self-reported baseline risk scores in follow-up scores for heart attack risk and selected coronary heart disease risk factors. Respondents generally gave consistent reports for family history, cigarette smoking, and relative weight (test-retest r > .75), but self-reported scores for physiologic status (blood pressure and cholesterol) and lifestyle (diet, physical activity, and stress) were much less stables Coefficients for heart attack risk and appraised age ranged from .43 to 087 for the four HRAs. The reliabilities of two self-scored instruments were greatly reduced by mathematical errors made by respondents when computing their heart attack risk scores. These results were not affected by the length of the follow-up period (seven to 12 weeks).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N