The Compatibility Dialectic: Mediating the Legitimate Coexistence of Islamic Law and State Law.

Islamic Law is not now and cannot be the state law of any state, whether Muslims are the majority or minority of the population. This view does not dispute the religious authority of Islamic Law for Muslims, which exists only outside the framework of the state. Still, some principles of Islamic Law...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 73; no. 1; pp. 1 - 30
Autor principal: An-Nacim, Abdullahi Ahmed
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=47410219&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 47410219
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2010
      vid: 73
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        47410219
        10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00782.x
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 264KB
      tig:
        atl: The Compatibility Dialectic: Mediating the Legitimate Coexistence of Islamic Law and State Law.
      aug:
        au: An-Nacim, Abdullahi Ahmed
        affil: fn85
      su:
        Dialectic
        Islamic law
        State laws
        Muslims
        Religious disputations
      sug:
        subj:
          Dialectic
          Islamic law
          State laws
          Muslims
          Religious disputations
      ab: Islamic Law is not now and cannot be the state law of any state, whether Muslims are the majority or minority of the population. This view does not dispute the religious authority of Islamic Law for Muslims, which exists only outside the framework of the state. Still, some principles of Islamic Law should be relevant to the public discourse, provided the argument is made in terms of what the author calls ‘civic reason’ and not simply by assertions of religious conviction. While the two are different types of normative systems, each based on its own sources of authority and legitimacy, there are possibilities of compatibility and mutual influence between Islamic Law and state law as complementary normative systems, without requiring either to conform to the nature and role of the other. This lecture examines the requirements, scope and dynamics of this dialectic relationship, whether Muslims are majority or minority.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N