There and Back Again, or the Problem of Locality in Biodiversity Surveys.

We argue that 'locality', perhaps the most mundane term in ecology, holds a basic ambiguity: two concepts of space-nomothetic and idiographic-which are both necessary for a rigorous resurvey to "the same" locality in the field, are committed to different practices with no common measurement. A case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 76; no. 3; pp. 273 - 295
Autores principales: Shavit, Ayelet, Griesemer, James
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Jul2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=47777803&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 47777803
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2009
      vid: 76
      iid: 3
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        47777803
        10.1086/649805
      ppf: 273
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 152KB
      tig:
        atl: There and Back Again, or the Problem of Locality in Biodiversity Surveys.
      aug:
        au:
          Shavit, Ayelet
          Griesemer, James
        affil:
          Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Tel-Hai Academic College, Upper Galilee, 12210 Israel
          Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616
      su:
        Zoogeography
        Biodiversity
        Animal diversity
        Geographical positions
        California
      sug:
        subj:
          California
          Zoogeography
          Biodiversity
          Animal diversity
          Geographical positions
      ab: We argue that 'locality', perhaps the most mundane term in ecology, holds a basic ambiguity: two concepts of space-nomothetic and idiographic-which are both necessary for a rigorous resurvey to "the same" locality in the field, are committed to different practices with no common measurement. A case study unfolds the failure of the standard assumption that an exogenous grid of longitude and latitude, as fine-grained as one wishes, suffices for revisiting a species locality. We briefly suggest a scale-dependent "resolution" for this replication problem, since it has no general, rational solution.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2009
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N