Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature.

Bare plurals ( dogs) behave in ways that quantified plurals ( some dogs) do not. For instance, while the sentence John owns dogs implies that John owns more than one dog, its negation John does not own dogs does not mean “John does not own more than one dog”, but rather “John does not own a dog”. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistics & Philosophy Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 353 - 408
Main Author: Zweig, Eytan
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Aug2009
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=48191117&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 48191117
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650157
        OJI
      jtl: Linguistics & Philosophy
      issn: 01650157
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2009
      vid: 32
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        48191117
        10.1007/s10988-009-9064-3
      ppf: 353
      ppct: 55
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 652KB
      tig:
        atl: Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature.
      aug:
        au: Zweig, Eytan
        affil: Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 4DD UK
      su:
        Number (Grammar)
        Nouns
        Verb phrases
        Language & languages
        Linguistics
        Schools
      sug:
        subj:
          Number (Grammar)
          Nouns
          Verb phrases
          Language & languages
          Linguistics
          Schools
      keyword:
        Bare plurals
        Dependent plurals
        Events
        Scalar implicature
      ab: Bare plurals ( dogs) behave in ways that quantified plurals ( some dogs) do not. For instance, while the sentence John owns dogs implies that John owns more than one dog, its negation John does not own dogs does not mean “John does not own more than one dog”, but rather “John does not own a dog”. A second puzzling behavior is known as the dependent plural reading; when in the scope of another plural, the ‘more than one’ meaning of the plural is not distributed over, but the existential force of the plural is. For example, My friends attend good schools requires that each of my friends attend one good school, not more, while at the same time being inappropriate if all my friends attend the same school. This paper shows that both these phenomena, and others, arise from the same cause. Namely, the plural noun itself does not assert ‘more than one’, but rather the plural denotes a predicate that is number neutral (unspecified for cardinality). The ‘more than one’ meaning arises as an scalar implicature, relying on the scalar relationship between the bare plural and its singular alternative, and calculated in a sub-sentential domain; namely, before existential closure of the event variable. Finally, implications of this analysis will be discussed for the analysis of the quantified noun phrases that interact with bare plurals, such as indefinite numeral DPs ( three boys), and singular universals ( every boy).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Linguistics & Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2009. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Linguistics & Philosophy
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2009
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N