Legal Enigmas—Antonio de Nebrija, The Da Vinci Code and the Emendation of Law.

It is rare in the extreme for a judge to embed an enigma, here an intentionally encrypted message, in the text of a judgment. Using the occasion of the cypher inserted into the judgment of Peter Smith J in Baigent v Random House, this article patiently reconstructs the humanist concept of aenigmata...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 71 - 100
Autor principal: GOODRICH, PETER
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jan2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=48752609&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 48752609
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01436503
        BJ4
      jtl: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
      issn: 01436503
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2010
      vid: 30
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        48752609
        10.1093/ojls/gqq001
      ppf: 71
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 181KB
      tig:
        atl: Legal Enigmas—Antonio de Nebrija, The Da Vinci Code and the Emendation of Law.
      aug:
        au: GOODRICH, PETER
        affil: Cardozo School of Law, New York
      su:
        Legal judgments
        Law & ethics
        Statutory interpretation
        Law & literature
        Jurisprudence
        Liberalism
      sug:
        subj:
          Legal judgments
          Law & ethics
          Statutory interpretation
          Law & literature
          Jurisprudence
          Liberalism
      ab: It is rare in the extreme for a judge to embed an enigma, here an intentionally encrypted message, in the text of a judgment. Using the occasion of the cypher inserted into the judgment of Peter Smith J in Baigent v Random House, this article patiently reconstructs the humanist concept of aenigmata iuris or legal enigmas so as properly to interpret this recent use. Legal enigmas are shown to be the residues of forgotten histories, references to lost texts, marks left by encounters between law and its now marginal literary and poetic sources. Where current legal use treats enigmas as mere obscurities, this article argues that the enigma should be apprehended and appreciated as an image of juristic invention, the moment of devising a decision, the instant of creative encounter between ‘the sciences liberall’, doctrine and law.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 Oxford University Press.
      item: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N