Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives.
Much earlier work claims that appositives and expressives are invariably speaker-oriented. These claims have recently been challenged, most extensively by Amaral et al. (Linguist and Philos 30(6): 707–749, 2007). We are convinced by this new evidence. The questions we address are (i) how widespread...
| Publicado en: | Linguistics & Philosophy Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 523 - 553 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=48915627&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 48915627 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01650157 OJI jtl: Linguistics & Philosophy issn: 01650157 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2009 vid: 32 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 48915627 10.1007/s10988-010-9070-5 ppf: 523 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 472KB tig: atl: Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives. aug: au: Harris, Jesse Potts, Christopher affil: University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003 USA Stanford University, Stanford 94305-21050 USA su: Perspective (Linguistics) Linguistics Language & languages Pragmatics Semantics (Philosophy) sug: subj: Perspective (Linguistics) Linguistics Language & languages Pragmatics Semantics (Philosophy) keyword: Appositives Corpus pragmatics Experimental pragmatics Expressives Perspective Regression analysis ab: Much earlier work claims that appositives and expressives are invariably speaker-oriented. These claims have recently been challenged, most extensively by Amaral et al. (Linguist and Philos 30(6): 707–749, 2007). We are convinced by this new evidence. The questions we address are (i) how widespread are non-speaker-oriented readings of appositives and expressives, and (ii) what are the underlying linguistic factors that make such readings available? We present two experiments and novel corpus work that bear directly on this issue. We find that non-speaker-oriented readings, while rare in actual language use, are systematic. We also find that non-speaker-oriented readings occur even outside of attitude predications, which leads us to favor an account based in pragmatically-mediated perspective shifting over one that relies on semantic binding by attitude predicates. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Linguistics & Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2009. All Rights Reserved. item: Linguistics & Philosophy holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|