Using Criminal Punishment to Serve Both Victim and Social Needs.

Part of a special issue on group-conflict resolution. The writers propose a change to the manner in which control rights over criminal sanctions are distributed that could increase victim well-being without interfering with social needs. They assert that granting the victim the right to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Law & Contemporary Problems Vol. 72; no. 2; pp. 199 - 218
Autores principales: O'Hara, Erin Ann, Robbins, Maria Mayo
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Duke University Spring2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=502094151&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 502094151
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00239186
        LCP
      jtl: Law & Contemporary Problems
      issn: 00239186
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2009
      vid: 72
      iid: 2
      pid: 588
      pub: Duke University
    artinfo:
      ui: 502094151
      ppf: 199
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Using Criminal Punishment to Serve Both Victim and Social Needs.
      aug:
        au:
          O'Hara, Erin Ann
          Robbins, Maria Mayo
      su:
        Restorative justice
        Victims of crimes -- Civil rights
        Criminal sentencing
      sug:
        subj:
          Restorative justice
          Victims of crimes -- Civil rights
          Criminal sentencing
      ab: Part of a special issue on group-conflict resolution. The writers propose a change to the manner in which control rights over criminal sanctions are distributed that could increase victim well-being without interfering with social needs. They assert that granting the victim the right to determine whether an offender will serve the last 10–20 percent of a prison term will not only help restore a sense of victim empowerment but will likely encourage voluntary victim-offender mediation (VOM), which has been demonstrated to assist the emotional healing process for victims while possibly decreasing recidivism rates. The writers outline recent victims' rights reform efforts and the rise in the use of VOM before presenting their proposal and considering possible objections.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N