How Does Science Come to Speak in the Courts? Citations, Intertexts, Expert Witnesses, Consequential Facts, and Reasoning.
Part of a special issue on conventions in science and law. The writer puts citation practices and intertextuality in science and the law in theoretical and historical perspective. He also considers the intersection of science and law by identifying the judicial rules that determine the role of sci...
| Publicado en: | Law & Contemporary Problems Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 91 - 121 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Duke University
Winter2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=502128105&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 502128105 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00239186 LCP jtl: Law & Contemporary Problems issn: 00239186 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Winter2009 vid: 72 iid: 1 pid: 588 pub: Duke University artinfo: ui: 502128105 ppf: 91 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 2.1MB tig: atl: How Does Science Come to Speak in the Courts? Citations, Intertexts, Expert Witnesses, Consequential Facts, and Reasoning. aug: au: Bazerman, Charles su: Expert evidence Science & law Product liability Citation of legal authorities sug: subj: Expert evidence Science & law Product liability Citation of legal authorities keyword: United States -- Supreme Court -- Decisions ab: Part of a special issue on conventions in science and law. The writer puts citation practices and intertextuality in science and the law in theoretical and historical perspective. He also considers the intersection of science and law by identifying the judicial rules that determine the role of scientific literature in court proceedings. He focuses on the idiosyncrasies of the U.S. legal system that affect both scientific and legal intertextuality in judicial reasoning. As a case study, he analyses litigation surrounding phenylpropanolamine, with particular attention to one crucial study and case. In this respect, he concentrates particularly on the judicial opinion as the site of judicial reasoning. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|