Freedom of speech, cyberspace, harassment law, and the Clinton administration.
Part of a special section on the Constitution under President Bill Clinton. The writer presents four cyberspace speech conflicts that involve what he maintains is the most interesting modern body of speech restrictions: hostile environment harassment law. In most of the controversies, the result...
| Publicado en: | Law & Contemporary Problems Vol. 63; no. 1/2; pp. 299 - 336 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Duke University
Winter/Spring2000
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=502357605&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 502357605 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00239186 LCP jtl: Law & Contemporary Problems issn: 00239186 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Winter/Spring2000 vid: 63 iid: 1/2 pid: 588 pub: Duke University artinfo: ui: 502357605 ppf: 299 ppct: 37 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 35.2MB tig: atl: Freedom of speech, cyberspace, harassment law, and the Clinton administration. aug: au: Volokh, Eugene su: Freedom of speech Harassment Internet laws United States sug: subj: United States Freedom of speech Harassment Internet laws ab: Part of a special section on the Constitution under President Bill Clinton. The writer presents four cyberspace speech conflicts that involve what he maintains is the most interesting modern body of speech restrictions: hostile environment harassment law. In most of the controversies, the result should mainly be driven not by the medium but by the relatively medium-independent underpinning free speech principles. The Clinton administration's role has been more as a consumer of the existing law rather than as a creator of new law. Each of the controversial events shows that there is much truth in the maligned maxim of a slippery slope—speech restrictions accrete over time, with each victory laying the groundwork for future, broader restrictions. The four conflicts are described under the following headlines: the hidden communication decency act; the hidden campus speech code; hostile public accommodations environment law; and harassment by library Internet access. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|