Scientific ignorance and reliable patterns of evidence in toxic tort causation: is there a need for liability reform?

Part of a special issue on causation in law and science. The writers question whether there is a need for liability reform in light of scientific ignorance and the need for reliable patterns of expert evidence in toxic tort causation. They consider how evidentiary reform has been directed by parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Law & Contemporary Problems Vol. 64; no. 4; pp. 5 - 49
Autores principales: Cranor, Carl F., Eastmond, David A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Duke University Autumn2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=502394175&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 502394175
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00239186
        LCP
      jtl: Law & Contemporary Problems
      issn: 00239186
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Autumn2001
      vid: 64
      iid: 4
      pid: 588
      pub: Duke University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        502394175
        10.2307/1192289
      ppf: 5
      ppct: 44
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 42.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Scientific ignorance and reliable patterns of evidence in toxic tort causation: is there a need for liability reform?
      aug:
        au:
          Cranor, Carl F.
          Eastmond, David A.
      su:
        Toxic torts
        Expert evidence
        Admissible evidence
        Tort reform
      sug:
        subj:
          Toxic torts
          Expert evidence
          Admissible evidence
          Tort reform
      ab: Part of a special issue on causation in law and science. The writers question whether there is a need for liability reform in light of scientific ignorance and the need for reliable patterns of expert evidence in toxic tort causation. They consider how evidentiary reform has been directed by particularly good but misleading fact scenarios and review the vast scientific ignorance of the universe of substances. They evaluate some scientifically legitimate and reliable patterns of evidence used by scientists to determine whether certain substances are carcinogenic, and they review some of the biological principles employed in support of these conclusions. They indicate that more far-reaching tort reforms might be required to serve the law, given the considerable scientific ignorance about potentially toxic substances.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N