Cyberporn and censorship: constitutional barriers to preventing access to internet pornography by minors.
Part of a special section on the Supreme Court is presented. In Reno v. ACLU, the Court found two provisions of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 to be unconstitutional due to their vagueness and the chilling effect their application would have on Internet communications. It is argued that an...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Vol. 88; no. 3; pp. 1015 - 1049 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Northwestern University
Spring98
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=502474898&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 502474898 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00914169 CLC jtl: Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology issn: 00914169 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring98 vid: 88 iid: 3 pid: 1093 pub: Northwestern University artinfo: ui: 502474898 10.2307/3491360 ppf: 1015 ppct: 34 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.4MB tig: atl: Cyberporn and censorship: constitutional barriers to preventing access to internet pornography by minors. aug: au: Simon, Glenn E. su: United States. Constitution. Bill of Rights Internet laws Internet pornography Obscenity (Law) Internet & children Freedom of speech Internet censorship United States sug: subj: United States United States. Constitution. Bill of Rights Internet laws Internet pornography Obscenity (Law) Internet & children Freedom of speech Internet censorship keyword: United States -- Supreme Court -- Decisions ab: Part of a special section on the Supreme Court is presented. In Reno v. ACLU, the Court found two provisions of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 to be unconstitutional due to their vagueness and the chilling effect their application would have on Internet communications. It is argued that any future attempt to regulate sexually explicit Internet transmissions must be drafted with adequate specificity in order to eliminate ambiguity as to the scope of its enforcement. The government's contention that this regulation is justified as an exercise of its zoning power is rejected. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|