Creative Reading.

Part of a special issue commemorating ten years of cultural environmentalism. A commentary on an article by Rebecca Tushnet that appears in this issue, which was, in turn, inspired by James Boyle's 1996 book, Shamans, Software, and Spleens. In her article, Tushnet examines fan creative practices t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Law & Contemporary Problems Vol. 70; no. 2; pp. 175 - 184
Autor principal: Litman, Jessica
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Duke University Spring2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=502557934&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 502557934
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00239186
        LCP
      jtl: Law & Contemporary Problems
      issn: 00239186
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2007
      vid: 70
      iid: 2
      pid: 588
      pub: Duke University
    artinfo:
      ui: 502557934
      ppf: 175
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 679KB
      tig:
        atl: Creative Reading.
      aug:
        au: Litman, Jessica
      su:
        Artistic creation
        Copyright infringement
        Fair use (Copyright)
        Fan fiction
      sug:
        subj:
          Artistic creation
          Copyright infringement
          Fair use (Copyright)
          Fan fiction
      ab: Part of a special issue commemorating ten years of cultural environmentalism. A commentary on an article by Rebecca Tushnet that appears in this issue, which was, in turn, inspired by James Boyle's 1996 book, Shamans, Software, and Spleens. In her article, Tushnet examines fan creative practices that make use of existing copyrighted material and how these practices offer insight into the regulation of creativity. The writer claims to be less optimistic than Tushnet concerning the capacity of the concept of fair use to protect the creativity of fans. She asserts that, overall, by disregarding the central importance of the consumers in the copyright scheme, legal scholars have all but conceded that the essential policy question in determining whether a given use of copyrighted material is lawful is the way the use is perceived by the copyright owner.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N