In defence of error theory.
Many contemporary philosophers rate error theories poorly. We identify the arguments these philosophers invoke, and expose their deficiencies. We thereby show that the prospects for error theory have been systematically underestimated. By undermining general arguments against all error theories, we...
| Publicado en: | Philosophical Studies Vol. 149; no. 2; pp. 209 - 231 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=50328789&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 50328789 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318116 4L8 jtl: Philosophical Studies issn: 00318116 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2010 vid: 149 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 50328789 10.1007/s11098-009-9346-1 ppf: 209 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 233KB tig: atl: In defence of error theory. aug: au: Daly, Chris Liggins, David affil: Philosophy Department, Manchester University, Manchester, UK. su: Philosophers Scholars Philosophy Humanists Error sug: subj: Philosophers Scholars Philosophy Humanists Error keyword: Charity Conservatism Error theory Justification Naturalism Realism ab: Many contemporary philosophers rate error theories poorly. We identify the arguments these philosophers invoke, and expose their deficiencies. We thereby show that the prospects for error theory have been systematically underestimated. By undermining general arguments against all error theories, we leave it open whether any more particular arguments against particular error theories are more successful. The merits of error theories need to be settled on a case-by-case basis: there is no good general argument against error theories. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2010. All Rights Reserved. item: Philosophical Studies holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2010 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|