How'm I doing?
Research by Penn State psychologist Kathryn Aikin suggests that when it comes to giving feedback, there may be no substitute for human touch. Aikin sent students on-line criticism of their performance in a game testing reasoning skills. Half the students were told that the computer provided the cr...
| Publicado en: | Psychology Today Vol. 29; pp. 16 - 17 |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Sussex Publishers Inc.
May/June 1996
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=503422129&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 503422129 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00333107 PSY jtl: Psychology Today issn: 00333107 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May/June 1996 vid: 29 pid: 375 pub: Sussex Publishers Inc. artinfo: ui: 503422129 ppf: 16 ppct: 1 formats: tig: atl: How'm I doing? aug: su: Computers & psychology Psychological feedback sug: subj: Computers & psychology Psychological feedback ab: Research by Penn State psychologist Kathryn Aikin suggests that when it comes to giving feedback, there may be no substitute for human touch. Aikin sent students on-line criticism of their performance in a game testing reasoning skills. Half the students were told that the computer provided the critiques, and the rest believed Aikin monitored their performance. She found that students were less likely to believe failure feedback when it came from a computer. pubtype: Periodical doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|