Distinguishing logic from association in the solution of an invisible displacement task by children (Homo sapiens) and dogs (Canis familiaris): using negation of disjunction.

Prior research on the ability to solve the Piagetian invisible displacement task has focused on prerequisite representational capacity. This study examines the additional prerequisite of deduction. As in other tasks (e.g., conservation and transitivity) it is difficult to distinguish between behav...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Comparative Psychology Vol. 115; no. 3; pp. 219 - 227
Main Authors: Watson, John S., Gergely, Gyorgy, Csanyi, Vilmos
Format: Article
Published: American Psychological Association September 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=506400729&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 506400729
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07357036
        JCY
      jtl: Journal of Comparative Psychology
      issn: 07357036
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 2001
      vid: 115
      iid: 3
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        506400729
        10.1037/0735-7036.115.3.219
      ppf: 219
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Distinguishing logic from association in the solution of an invisible displacement task by children (Homo sapiens) and dogs (Canis familiaris): using negation of disjunction.
      aug:
        au:
          Watson, John S.
          Gergely, Gyorgy
          Csanyi, Vilmos
      su:
        Psychology, Comparative
        Object permanence (Psychology)
        Dogs -- Behavior
        Animal cognition
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychology, Comparative
          Object permanence (Psychology)
          Dogs -- Behavior
          Animal cognition
      ab: Prior research on the ability to solve the Piagetian invisible displacement task has focused on prerequisite representational capacity. This study examines the additional prerequisite of deduction. As in other tasks (e.g., conservation and transitivity) it is difficult to distinguish between behavior that reflects logical inference from behavior that reflects generalization. Using the role of negation in logic whereby negative feedback about one belief increases the certainty of another (e.g., a disjunctive syllogism), task-naive dogs (Canis familiaris; n = 19) and 4- to 6-year-old children (Homo sapiens; n = 24) were given a task wherein a desirable object was shown to have disappeared from a container after it had passed behind 3 separate screens. As predicted, children ( as per logic of negated disjunction) tended to increase their speed of checking the 3rd screen after failing to find the object behind the first 2 screens, whereas dogs (as per associative extinction) tended to significantly decrease their speed of checking the 3rd screen after failing to find the object behind the first 2 screens. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N