Making Inferences About the Location of Hidden Food: Social Dog, Causal Ape.

Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and great apes from the genus Pan were tested on a series of object choice tasks. In each task, the location of hidden food was indicated for subjects by some kind of communicative, behavioral, or physical cue. On the basis of differences in the ecologies of these 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Comparative Psychology Vol. 120; no. 1; pp. 38 - 48
Main Authors: Bräuer, Juliane, Kaminski, Juliane, Riedel, Julia
Format: Article
Published: American Psychological Association February 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=506693153&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 506693153
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07357036
        JCY
      jtl: Journal of Comparative Psychology
      issn: 07357036
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2006
      vid: 120
      iid: 1
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        506693153
        10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.38
      ppf: 38
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Making Inferences About the Location of Hidden Food: Social Dog, Causal Ape.
      aug:
        au:
          Bräuer, Juliane
          Kaminski, Juliane
          Riedel, Julia
      su:
        Inference (Logic)
        Prompts (Psychology)
        Psychology, Comparative
        Ape behavior
        Dogs -- Behavior
      sug:
        subj:
          Inference (Logic)
          Prompts (Psychology)
          Psychology, Comparative
          Ape behavior
          Dogs -- Behavior
      ab: Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and great apes from the genus Pan were tested on a series of object choice tasks. In each task, the location of hidden food was indicated for subjects by some kind of communicative, behavioral, or physical cue. On the basis of differences in the ecologies of these 2 genera, as well as on previous research, the authors hypothesized that dogs should be especially skillful in using human communicative cues such as the pointing gesture, whereas apes should be especially skillful in using physical, causal cues such as food in a cup making noise when it is shaken. The overall pattern of performance by the 2 genera strongly supported this social-dog, causal-ape hypothesis. This result is discussed in terms of apes' adaptations for complex, extractive foraging and dogs' adaptations, during the domestication process, for cooperative communication with humans. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N