Improving descriptions of single-subject experiments in research texts written for undergraduates.

Many undergraduate research methods texts assume that single-subject experiments are (a) low in generality, (b) merely pilot studies, (c) unsuitable when treatment effects are gradual or irreversible, (d) only useful when multiple-treatment interference is low, and (e) questionable because tests of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychological Record Vol. 49; no. 1; pp. 49 - 67
Autores principales: Dermer, Marshall L., Hoch, Theodore A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Psychological Record Winter99
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507605929&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507605929
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00332933
        PSD
      jtl: Psychological Record
      issn: 00332933
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Winter99
      vid: 49
      iid: 1
      pid: 761
      pub: Psychological Record
    artinfo:
      ui: 507605929
      ppf: 49
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 995KB
      tig:
        atl: Improving descriptions of single-subject experiments in research texts written for undergraduates.
      aug:
        au:
          Dermer, Marshall L.
          Hoch, Theodore A.
      su:
        Psychology textbooks
        Single subject research
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychology textbooks
          Single subject research
      ab: Many undergraduate research methods texts assume that single-subject experiments are (a) low in generality, (b) merely pilot studies, (c) unsuitable when treatment effects are gradual or irreversible, (d) only useful when multiple-treatment interference is low, and (e) questionable because tests of statistical significance are absent. We critically examine these misconceptions, with the goal of improving the single-subject experiment's description in these texts and increasing its use beyond the area of behavior analysis. We subsequently compare multi-subject and single-subject experimentation in terms of research process and the alignment of psychological research with theory and practice. We conclude that psychological science and practice will be enhanced by methods texts accurately describing single-subject experiments and these texts addressing the problem of “individual-subject validity”: the extent causal relations between treatments and outcomes are assessed at the level of the single-subject. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N