Psychometric equivalence of the computer and booklet forms of the MMPI: a meta-analysis.
Inconsistent findings have repeatedly been found by researchers attempting to determine whether the computer form of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is psychometrically equivalent to the booklet form. This article applied psychometric meta-analysis to pool results from all av...
| Publicado en: | Psychological Assessment Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 58 - 67 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
March 1999
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507613549&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 507613549 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10403590 POL jtl: Psychological Assessment issn: 10403590 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: March 1999 vid: 11 iid: 1 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 507613549 10.1037/1040-3590.11.1.58 ppf: 58 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: Psychometric equivalence of the computer and booklet forms of the MMPI: a meta-analysis. aug: au: Finger, Michael S. Ones, Deniz S. su: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Test design Examination administrators sug: subj: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Test design Examination administrators keyword: Tests and scales -- Forms ab: Inconsistent findings have repeatedly been found by researchers attempting to determine whether the computer form of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is psychometrically equivalent to the booklet form. This article applied psychometric meta-analysis to pool results from all available studies to examine the equivalence of the computer and booklet MMPI forms. Means, standard deviations, and crossform correlations were cumulated. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature demonstrated that the disparate findings can be explained in terms of sampling error across individual studies. Differences in means and standard deviations across studies were near 0, and crossform rank orderings were near perfect. The results of this study suggest that the computer and booklet forms of the MMPI are psychometrically equivalent. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|