Rural residents' knowledge of lead poisoning prevention.

This cross-sectional study assessed rural adults' knowledge of lead poisoning prevention. Residents of three rural Ohio counties were randomly selected to answer 15 True/False lead poisoning prevention questions and 12 demographic questions via telephone. Because not all residents have a phone, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Community Health Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 393 - 409
Autor principal: Polivka, Barbara J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. October 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507656866&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507656866
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00945145
        JCH
      jtl: Journal of Community Health
      issn: 00945145
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: October 1999
      vid: 24
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui: 507656866
      ppf: 393
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 172KB
      tig:
        atl: Rural residents' knowledge of lead poisoning prevention.
      aug:
        au: Polivka, Barbara J.
      su:
        Lead poisoning prevention
        Health literacy
        Rural health services
        Children's health
        Ohio
      sug:
        subj:
          Ohio
          Lead poisoning prevention
          Health literacy
          Rural health services
          Children's health
      ab: This cross-sectional study assessed rural adults' knowledge of lead poisoning prevention. Residents of three rural Ohio counties were randomly selected to answer 15 True/False lead poisoning prevention questions and 12 demographic questions via telephone. Because not all residents have a phone, the survey was also mailed to Women, Infants and Children (WIC) recipients without phones in the three counties using Dillman's (1978) mailed survey methods. Both groups of respondents correctly answered an average of two-thirds of the questions. In the random sample (n=1,211) correct scores were related to being elderly, unemployed, female, having a high school education or less, and not being exposed to lead poisoning prevention education during the previous week. Factors predictive of lower lead knowledge scores for the WIC respondents without phones (n=69) were age (22 and 27 years), unemployment, marital status (married), type of dwelling (other than a single family home or apartment), and having fewer children. Most respondents were able to identify groups at high-risk for lead poisoning, that lead poisoning could occur in ways other than ingestion of lead paint chips, lead poisoning results in long-term learning problems in children, and a blood test is used to determine blood lead levels. Respondents were less knowledgeable about methods of lead exposure and the importance of prevention measures. Gaps in lead poisoning prevention knowledge exist for rural residents and educational efforts should focus on decreasing these gaps. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N