A quantitative review of the effect of computerized testing on the measurement of social desirability.

The writers conducted a meta-analysis to ascertain the degree to which the computer administration of a measure affects socially desirable responding. They defined social desirability as consisting of impression management and self-deceptive enhancement. They argued that a small but statistically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Educational & Psychological Measurement Vol. 60; no. 3; pp. 340 - 361
Autores principales: Dwight, Stephen A., Feigelson, Melissa E.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. June 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507701134&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507701134
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00131644
        EPM
      jtl: Educational & Psychological Measurement
      issn: 00131644
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: June 2000
      vid: 60
      iid: 3
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507701134
        10.1177/00131640021970583
      ppf: 340
      ppct: 21
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A quantitative review of the effect of computerized testing on the measurement of social desirability.
      aug:
        au:
          Dwight, Stephen A.
          Feigelson, Melissa E.
      su:
        Meta-analysis
        Personality tests
        Truthfulness & falsehood
        Effect sizes (Statistics)
        Computer software
        Examinations
        Self-presentation
      sug:
        subj:
          Meta-analysis
          Personality tests
          Truthfulness & falsehood
          Effect sizes (Statistics)
          Computer software
          Examinations
          Self-presentation
      ab: The writers conducted a meta-analysis to ascertain the degree to which the computer administration of a measure affects socially desirable responding. They defined social desirability as consisting of impression management and self-deceptive enhancement. They argued that a small but statistically significant effect was observed for impression management, with impression management being lower when evaluated by computer. However, they asserted that correlational analysis indicated that the strength of the effect of computer administration on impression management seemed to diminish over time such that more recent studies have detected small or no effects. In addition, they found that reports of self-deceptive enhancement did not vary by testing format. Finally, they considered the implications of the results in terms of how they contribute to the explication of the construct of social desirability and cross-mode equivalence.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N