Examining the roles of rule following, reinforcement, and preexprerimental histories on risk-taking behavior.

The purpose of the present study was to examine the participation of a variety of variables in gambling behavior. Forty-five subjects were exposed to an experimental roulette game played for course extra-credit points. In Phase 1, subjects played a fair game (i.e., completely random outcomes) withou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychological Record Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 687 - 705
Autores principales: Dixon, Mark R., Hayes, Linda J., Aban, Immaculada B.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Psychological Record Fall2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507725532&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507725532
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00332933
        PSD
      jtl: Psychological Record
      issn: 00332933
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall2000
      vid: 50
      iid: 4
      pid: 761
      pub: Psychological Record
    artinfo:
      ui: 507725532
      ppf: 687
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 835KB
      tig:
        atl: Examining the roles of rule following, reinforcement, and preexprerimental histories on risk-taking behavior.
      aug:
        au:
          Dixon, Mark R.
          Hayes, Linda J.
          Aban, Immaculada B.
      su:
        Risk
        Gambler psychology
        Reinforcement (Psychology)
        Problem solving
      sug:
        subj:
          Risk
          Gambler psychology
          Reinforcement (Psychology)
          Problem solving
      ab: The purpose of the present study was to examine the participation of a variety of variables in gambling behavior. Forty-five subjects were exposed to an experimental roulette game played for course extra-credit points. In Phase 1, subjects played a fair game (i.e., completely random outcomes) without any instructions regarding the programmed contingencies for 75 trials. During Phase 2, subjects were exposed to an adjusted game with payback percentages of either p = .2, p = .8, or continued at p = fair and instructions related to play. Lastly, during Phase 3 all subjects were exposed to an adjusted game with a payback percentage of .2 and an option for escape. Results show that subjects exposed to inaccurate rules regarding play took higher levels of risk, made larger bets, and chose the escape option later than subjects exposed to accurate or no rules related to play. Although reinforcement density varied across subjects exposed to the same rule condition, there was no significant effect of that manipulation on subsequent gambles. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N