| Sumario: | The authors investigated how 2 groups with different attitudes toward animal experimentation—researchers who conducted animal experiments and members of animal welfare organizations who protested against animal experiments—made attributions for the behavior of the opposing group. The 2 groups showed an actor-observer effect, mentioning more internal causes for the opponents' behavior and more external causes for their own behavior. Both groups were able to take the other's perspective, resulting in a reversed actor-observer effect. The less involved participants followed the pattern of ratings of the group whose attitudes corresponded to their own. In particular, the participants with a negative attitude toward animal experimentation rated researchers' behavior as more internally caused than did those with a positive attitude. The results illustrated how the participants formed and defended attitudes in a social context. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
|
|---|