Computer-assisted feedback-driven quality management for psychotherapy: the Stuggart-Heidelberg model.
The authors present the Stuttgart–Heidelberg Model for quality management of psychotherapy. The system is characterized as an active internal approach with external support from researchers. Problem-solving activities are initiated and maintained by computer-assisted feedback on possible treatment...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 173 - 184 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
April 2001
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507764062&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 507764062 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0022006X JCC jtl: Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology issn: 0022006X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: April 2001 vid: 69 iid: 2 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 507764062 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.173 ppf: 173 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Computer-assisted feedback-driven quality management for psychotherapy: the Stuggart-Heidelberg model. aug: au: Kordy, Hans Hannöver, Wolfgang Richard, Matthias su: Evaluation of psychotherapy Psychotherapy Computer software sug: subj: Evaluation of psychotherapy Psychotherapy Computer software ab: The authors present the Stuttgart–Heidelberg Model for quality management of psychotherapy. The system is characterized as an active internal approach with external support from researchers. Problem-solving activities are initiated and maintained by computer-assisted feedback on possible treatment shortcomings. The system provides support for the 3 key tasks of quality management: (a) monitoring of relevant quality criteria in the clinical routine, (b) standardized assessment that allows comparison with established standards at various levels of service provision, and (c) transfer of information on achieved quality to those whom it concerns. The central function of the system is an alarm function, signaling a possible deficit of the provided psychotherapy on the basis of the standard evaluation of treatment outcome for individual patients. In this article, the main system components are described and data on its feasibility and validity are presented. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|