The Myth of Individualism-Collectivism: A Critical Review.

The authors critically assess the dimension of individualism-collectivism (I-C) and its various uses in cross-cultural psychology. They argue that I-C research is characterized largely by insufficient conceptual clarity and a lack of systematic data. As a result, they call into question the utility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 142; no. 4; pp. 461 - 481
Autores principales: Voronov, Maxim, Singer, Jefferson A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd August 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507778696&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507778696
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00224545
        JSY
      jtl: Journal of Social Psychology
      issn: 00224545
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: August 2002
      vid: 142
      iid: 4
      pid: 58221
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507778696
        10.1080/00224540209603912
      ppf: 461
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 103KB
      tig:
        atl: The Myth of Individualism-Collectivism: A Critical Review.
      aug:
        au:
          Voronov, Maxim
          Singer, Jefferson A.
      su:
        Collectivism (Social psychology)
        Individualism
        Psychology -- Cross-cultural studies
      sug:
        subj:
          Collectivism (Social psychology)
          Individualism
          Psychology -- Cross-cultural studies
      ab: The authors critically assess the dimension of individualism-collectivism (I-C) and its various uses in cross-cultural psychology. They argue that I-C research is characterized largely by insufficient conceptual clarity and a lack of systematic data. As a result, they call into question the utility of I-C as an explanatory tool for cultural variation in behavior, suggest alternative dimensions for cross-cultural research, and interpret the weaknesses of research on I-C as illustrative of a general trend in social psychology. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N