A Comparison of Computer-Based Versus Pencil-and-Paper Assessment of Drug Use.
A study was conducted to investigate whether client responses to a structured interview differed when the interview was administered using a pencil and paper or a computer. Findings revealed in general clients provided the same responses in both types of interview and that there was no evidence tha...
| Publicado en: | Research on Social Work Practice Vol. 12; no. 5; pp. 669 - 684 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
September 2002
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507782190&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 507782190 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10497315 RSW jtl: Research on Social Work Practice issn: 10497315 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: September 2002 vid: 12 iid: 5 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. artinfo: ui: 507782190 10.1177/1049731502012005006 ppf: 669 ppct: 15 formats: tig: atl: A Comparison of Computer-Based Versus Pencil-and-Paper Assessment of Drug Use. aug: au: Sarrazin, Mary S. Vaughan Hall, James A. Richards, Christopher keyword: Drug abuse -- Tests and scales -- Computer programs Drug abuse -- Tests and scales -- Format ab: A study was conducted to investigate whether client responses to a structured interview differed when the interview was administered using a pencil and paper or a computer. Findings revealed in general clients provided the same responses in both types of interview and that there was no evidence that the use of computerized clinical assessments by social work practitioners might compromise the validity of client responses. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|