Limitations in the Use of Achievement Tests as Measures of Educators’ Productivity.

Test-based accountability rests on the assumption that accountability for scores on tests will provide needed incentives for teachers to improve student performance. Evidence shows, however, that simple test-based accountability can generate perverse incentives and seriously inflated scores. This pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Human Resources Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 752 - 778
Autor principal: Koretz, Daniel M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Wisconsin Press Fall2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507792246&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507792246
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0022166X
        JHR
      jtl: Journal of Human Resources
      issn: 0022166X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall2002
      vid: 37
      iid: 4
      pid: 249
      pub: University of Wisconsin Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507792246
        10.2307/3069616
      ppf: 752
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1MB
      tig:
        atl: Limitations in the Use of Achievement Tests as Measures of Educators’ Productivity.
      aug:
        au: Koretz, Daniel M.
      su:
        Achievement tests
        Authentic assessment
      sug:
        subj:
          Achievement tests
          Authentic assessment
      ab: Test-based accountability rests on the assumption that accountability for scores on tests will provide needed incentives for teachers to improve student performance. Evidence shows, however, that simple test-based accountability can generate perverse incentives and seriously inflated scores. This paper discusses the logic of achievement tests, issues that arise in using them as proxy indicators of educational quality, and the mechanism underlying the inflation of scores. It ends with suggestions, some speculative, for improving the incentives faced by teachers by modifying systems of student assessment and combining them with numerous other measures, many of which are more subjective than are test scores. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N