Threat and Social Choice: When Eye Size Matters.

The Environmental Security Hypothesis (T. F. Pettijohn II & A. Tesser, 1999) indicates that as environmental threat increases, the desirability of persons with neotenous features should decrease. In 2 experiments (Ns = 96, 80), the authors tested this hypothesis and a mediation account that was base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 145; no. 5; pp. 547 - 571
Autores principales: Pettijohn, Terry F., Tesser, Abraham
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd October 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507828130&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507828130
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00224545
        JSY
      jtl: Journal of Social Psychology
      issn: 00224545
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: October 2005
      vid: 145
      iid: 5
      pid: 58221
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507828130
        10.3200/SOCP.145.5.547-570
      ppf: 547
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 136KB
      tig:
        atl: Threat and Social Choice: When Eye Size Matters.
      aug:
        au:
          Pettijohn, Terry F.
          Tesser, Abraham
      su:
        Threat (Psychology)
        Face
        Social perception
      sug:
        subj:
          Threat (Psychology)
          Face
          Social perception
      ab: The Environmental Security Hypothesis (T. F. Pettijohn II & A. Tesser, 1999) indicates that as environmental threat increases, the desirability of persons with neotenous features should decrease. In 2 experiments (Ns = 96, 80), the authors tested this hypothesis and a mediation account that was based on the attributions made about neotenous and mature-featured others. In each experiment, the authors manipulated threat and gave participants the choice of a neotenous (increased eye-size) or mature (decreased eye-size) female partner. The authors tested mediation in Study I by experimentally uncoupling attributions from facial features and in Study 2 by manipulating the participant's dependence on his or her partner. Both studies provided evidence for the Environmental Security Hypothesis: Preference for partners with neotenous facial features decreased under high threat. Support for the role of attributions as mediators was mixed. An alternative interpretation of the results indicates the possibility that responses to facial features may depend on nonconscious processing. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N