Meta-Analysis of MFT Interventions.

This article briefly reviews 20 meta-analyses of marital and family interventions. These meta-analyses support the efficacy of both MFT for distressed couples, and marital and family enrichment. Those effects are slightly reduced at follow-up, but still significant. Differences among kinds of marita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Marital & Family Therapy Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 547 - 571
Autores principales: Shadish, William R., Baldwin, Scott A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell October 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507854453&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507854453
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0194472X
        JMF
      jtl: Journal of Marital & Family Therapy
      issn: 0194472X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: October 2003
      vid: 29
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507854453
        10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01694.x
      ppf: 547
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 2MB
      tig:
        atl: Meta-Analysis of MFT Interventions.
      aug:
        au:
          Shadish, William R.
          Baldwin, Scott A.
      su:
        Family psychotherapy
        Meta-analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Family psychotherapy
          Meta-analysis
      ab: This article briefly reviews 20 meta-analyses of marital and family interventions. These meta-analyses support the efficacy of both MFT for distressed couples, and marital and family enrichment. Those effects are slightly reduced at follow-up, but still significant. Differences among kinds of marital and family interventions tend to be small. MFT produce clinically significant results in 40-50% of those treated, but the effects of MFT in clinically representative settings have not been much studied. The article also introduces the concept of meta-analytically supported treatments (MASTs), which are treatments that meet certain criteria for efficacy in meta-analysis, and which remedy certain problems in the empirically supported treatment (EST) literature. The article concludes with recommendations for doing better meta-analyses. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N