Gender Differences in Delay of Gratification: A Meta-Analysis.

A series of meta-analyses were conducted to test Bjorklund and Kipp's hypothesis that due to selection pressures operating during evolution, women and girls are better able than men and boys to delay gratification (Bjorklund & Kipp, 1996). A total of 38 effect sizes were derived from 33 studies in w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Sex Roles Vol. 49; no. 9/10; pp. 451 - 464
Autor principal: Silverman, Irwin W.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. November 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507861503&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507861503
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03600025
        SXR
      jtl: Sex Roles
      issn: 03600025
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 2003
      vid: 49
      iid: 9/10
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui: 507861503
      ppf: 451
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 15.6MB
      tig:
        atl: Gender Differences in Delay of Gratification: A Meta-Analysis.
      aug:
        au: Silverman, Irwin W.
      su:
        Delay of gratification
        Gender differences (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Delay of gratification
          Gender differences (Psychology)
      ab: A series of meta-analyses were conducted to test Bjorklund and Kipp's hypothesis that due to selection pressures operating during evolution, women and girls are better able than men and boys to delay gratification (Bjorklund & Kipp, 1996). A total of 38 effect sizes were derived from 33 studies in which participants made one or more choices between a small (or less preferred) immediate reward and a large (or more preferred) delayed reward. Overall, there was a small female advantage (r = .058). Further analyses revealed that the female advantage was larger when continuous measures (r = .096) rather than dichotomous measures were used (r = .021). No evidence was found for the gender gap changing systematically with age. Discussion focuses primarily on alternative explanations for the gender difference found here. Consideration is also given to how the female advantage in delay of gratification might be reflected in real-life situations. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N