Dog behaviour: Sensitive souls.

In February 2004, at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Seattle, Washington, Brian Hare of Harvard University discussed his hypothesis that dogs are superbly sensitive to social cues from people. Hare tested his idea by comparing the abilities of dogs w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Economist Vol. 370; pp. 78 - 79
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Economist Newspaper Limited 2/21/2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507889835&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507889835
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00130613
        ECO
      jtl: Economist
      issn: 00130613
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2/21/2004
      vid: 370
      pid: 161
      pub: Economist Newspaper Limited
    artinfo:
      ui: 507889835
      ppf: 78
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Dog behaviour: Sensitive souls.
      aug:
      su: Dogs -- Behavior
      sug:
        subj: Dogs -- Behavior
      ab: In February 2004, at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Seattle, Washington, Brian Hare of Harvard University discussed his hypothesis that dogs are superbly sensitive to social cues from people. Hare tested his idea by comparing the abilities of dogs with those of chimpanzees, which are often regarded as second only to people in their level of innate intelligence; Hare found that his hypothesis was correct in that chimpanzees did not get the idea of social signals that dogs did.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N