An Integrated Theory of the Mind.
Adaptive control of thought-rational (ACT-R; J. R. Anderson & C. Lebiere, 1998) has evolved into a theory that consists of multiple modules but also explains how these modules are integrated to produce coherent cognition. The perceptual-motor modules, the goal module, and the declarative memory modu...
| Publicado en: | Psychological Review Vol. 111; no. 4; pp. 1036 - 1061 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
Oct2004
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507934132&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 507934132 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0033295X PYV jtl: Psychological Review issn: 0033295X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2004 vid: 111 iid: 4 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 507934132 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036 ppf: 1036 ppct: 25 formats: tig: atl: An Integrated Theory of the Mind. aug: au: Anderson, John R. Bothell, Daniel Byrne, Michael D. su: Brain function localization Psychology of learning Philosophy of mind sug: subj: Brain function localization Psychology of learning Philosophy of mind ab: Adaptive control of thought-rational (ACT-R; J. R. Anderson & C. Lebiere, 1998) has evolved into a theory that consists of multiple modules but also explains how these modules are integrated to produce coherent cognition. The perceptual-motor modules, the goal module, and the declarative memory module are presented as examples of specialized systems in ACT-R. These modules are associated with distinct cortical regions. These modules place chunks in buffers where they can be detected by a production system that responds to patterns of information in the buffers. At any point in time, a single production rule is selected to respond to the current pattern. Subsymbolic processes serve to guide the selection of rules to fire as well as the internal operations of some modules. Much of learning involves tuning of these subsymbolic processes. A number of simple and complex empirical examples are described to illustrate how these modules function singly and in concert. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|