Prior experience can influence whether the whole is different from the sum of its parts.

In two conditioning experiments with humans, we found that participants' prior experience exerted considerable influence on later learning of configural discrimination problems. Prior experience was manipulated by pre-training participants before the main acquisition stage. They either received a di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Learning & Motivation Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 20 - 42
Autores principales: Melchers, Klaus G., Lachnit, Harald, Üngör, Metin
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. February 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507967899&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507967899
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00239690
        LMO
      jtl: Learning & Motivation
      issn: 00239690
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2005
      vid: 36
      iid: 1
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507967899
        10.1016/j.lmot.2004.06.002
      ppf: 20
      ppct: 22
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Prior experience can influence whether the whole is different from the sum of its parts.
      aug:
        au:
          Melchers, Klaus G.
          Lachnit, Harald
          Üngör, Metin
      su:
        Conditioned response
        Reinforcement (Psychology)
        Differentiation (Cognition)
      sug:
        subj:
          Conditioned response
          Reinforcement (Psychology)
          Differentiation (Cognition)
      keyword: Discrimination (Psychology)
      ab: In two conditioning experiments with humans, we found that participants' prior experience exerted considerable influence on later learning of configural discrimination problems. Prior experience was manipulated by pre-training participants before the main acquisition stage. They either received a discrimination problem that encouraged an elemental solution (A+, B-, AB+, CD- in Experiment I and A+, AB+, C-, CB- in Experiment 2) or one that required a configural solution (AB+, BC-, CD+, DA- in Experiment I and A-, AB+, C+, CB- in Experiment 2). Then, all participants were shown a discrimination that required a configural solution (E+, F+, EF- in Experiment 1 and DE+, EF-, FG+, GD- in Experiment 2). In both experiments, participants who had received elemental pre-training were impaired on the later configural problem compared to participants who had received configural pre-training. The results suggest that organisms can flexibly process stimuli elementally or configurally. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N