Internal and External Ethnic Assessments in Eastern Europe.

Survey data for majority and minority ethnicities in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Russia illustrate how internal ethnic identification and other social characteristics influence external ethnic classification. Logistic regressions show how interviewers use negative social characteristics (poverty,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Forces (University of North Carolina Press) Vol. 86; no. 1; pp. 231 - 257
Autores principales: Ahmed, Patricia, Feliciano, Cynthia, Emigh, Rebecca Jean
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / UK September 2007
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507994846&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507994846
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00377732
        SFR
      jtl: Social Forces (University of North Carolina Press)
      issn: 00377732
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 2007
      vid: 86
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / UK
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507994846
        10.1353/sof.2007.0087
      ppf: 231
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 7.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Internal and External Ethnic Assessments in Eastern Europe.
      aug:
        au:
          Ahmed, Patricia
          Feliciano, Cynthia
          Emigh, Rebecca Jean
      keyword: Eastern Europe -- Minorities -- Ethnic identity
      ab: Survey data for majority and minority ethnicities in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Russia illustrate how internal ethnic identification and other social characteristics influence external ethnic classification. Logistic regressions show how interviewers use negative social characteristics (poverty, low education) to classify respondents as Roma (Gypsies) who did not self-identify as such. In contrast, for other minorities (Hungarians in Romania, Ukrainians in Russia) and majorities, these characteristics had the opposite or little effect, though self-identification, parents' ethnicity and language were influential. Interviewers' classifications tend to include, not exclude, these ethnicities as majorities. Thus, classifications are external and exclusionary for the racialized ethnicity, Roma, while classifications are optional and inclusive for other ethnicities. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N