A Comparison of the Completeness and Timeliness of Automated Electronic Laboratory Reporting and Spontaneous Reporting of Notifiable Conditions.

Objectives. We examined whether automated electronic laboratory reporting of notifiable-diseases results in information being delivered to public health departments more completely and quickly than is the case with spontaneous, paper-based reporting. Methods. We used data from a local public health...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Journal of Public Health Vol. 98; no. 2; pp. 344 - 351
Main Authors: Overhage, J. Marc, Grannis, Shaun, McDonald, Clement J.
Format: Article
Published: American Public Health Association February 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508043339&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508043339
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00900036
        APH
      jtl: American Journal of Public Health
      issn: 00900036
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2008
      vid: 98
      iid: 2
      pid: 44
      pub: American Public Health Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508043339
        10.2105/AJPH.2006.092700
      ppf: 344
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A Comparison of the Completeness and Timeliness of Automated Electronic Laboratory Reporting and Spontaneous Reporting of Notifiable Conditions.
      aug:
        au:
          Overhage, J. Marc
          Grannis, Shaun
          McDonald, Clement J.
      su:
        Diseases -- Reporting
        Information storage & retrieval systems -- Public health
        Medical databases
        Public health
        Equipment & supplies
        Nosocomial infections
        Therapeutics
        Health education
        Education software
      sug:
        subj:
          Diseases -- Reporting
          Information storage & retrieval systems -- Public health
          Medical databases
          Public health
          Equipment & supplies
          Nosocomial infections
          Therapeutics
          Health education
          Education software
      ab: Objectives. We examined whether automated electronic laboratory reporting of notifiable-diseases results in information being delivered to public health departments more completely and quickly than is the case with spontaneous, paper-based reporting. Methods. We used data from a local public health department, hospital infection control departments, and a community-wide health information exchange to identify all potential cases of notifiable conditions that occurred in Marion County, Ind, during the first quarter of 2001. We compared traditional spontaneous reporting to the health department with automated electronic laboratory reporting through the health information exchange. Results. After reports obtained using the 2 methods had been matched, there were 4785 unique reports for 53 different conditions during the study period. Chlamydia was the most common condition, followed by hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and gonorrhea. Automated electronic laboratory reporting identified 4.4 times as many cases as traditional spontaneous, paper-based methods and identified those cases 7.9 days earlier than spontaneous reporting. Conclusions. Automated electronic laboratory reporting improves the completeness and timeliness of disease surveillance, which will enhance public health awareness and reporting efficiency. (Am J Public Health. 2008;98:344-350. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.092700) Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N