Pair dynamics in team collaboration.

From a recent field survey with a group of professional pair programmers, it was revealed that the programmers perceive a partner's personality, cognitive style and communication skills as the top three factors that lead to prudent pair programming. Based on this finding, the factors personality and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 25; no. 4; pp. 844 - 853
Main Authors: Choi, Kyungsub Steve, Deek, Fadi P., Im, Il
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Science July 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508074645&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508074645
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07475632
        JC4
      jtl: Computers in Human Behavior
      issn: 07475632
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: July 2009
      vid: 25
      iid: 4
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508074645
        10.1016/j.chb.2008.09.005
      ppf: 844
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Pair dynamics in team collaboration.
      aug:
        au:
          Choi, Kyungsub Steve
          Deek, Fadi P.
          Im, Il
      su:
        Satisfaction
        Psychology of learning
        Team learning approach in education
        Interpersonal communication
        Gender differences (Psychology)
        Computer programmers
        Social history
      sug:
        subj:
          Satisfaction
          Psychology of learning
          Team learning approach in education
          Interpersonal communication
          Gender differences (Psychology)
          Computer programmers
          Social history
      ab: From a recent field survey with a group of professional pair programmers, it was revealed that the programmers perceive a partner's personality, cognitive style and communication skills as the top three factors that lead to prudent pair programming. Based on this finding, the factors personality and communication skills, along with gender were selected for an experiment to analyze if a partner's human, intrinsic values influence the pair programming experience, specifically in the levels of satisfaction, compatibility, communication, and confidence. A total of 128 students majoring in Management Information Systems, Information Systems, and Information Technology participated in the experiment. Of the 68 undergraduates, 40 were first-year students and 28 were juniors; the remaining 60 were Master's degree graduate students. The students were formed into a total of 64 pairs based on their personality, level of communication skills, and gender. A total of three visits were made. During the first two visits, a set of four programming problems was used in four programming sessions lasting 45min each; two were individual programming sessions and two were pair programming sessions. At the end of each visit, a questionnaire was administered and collected. The questionnaire results revealed that the various Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality combinations did not significantly influence the levels of communication, satisfaction, confidence, and compatibility. The pairs that exhibited a high level of communication between partners did not necessarily experience a high level of satisfaction or exhibit compatibility between partners, nor did they have a high level of confidence regarding the finished product. The communication skill level seemed to have an impact on communication only. Similar to many previous gender-focused literatures, the same gender pairs did exhibit significantly higher levels of communication, satisfaction and compatibility than the mixed gender pairs. Within the same gender pairs, the female-female pairs showed a much higher level than the male-male pairs in those categories. Contrariwise, the same gender pairs did not show a significantly higher confidence level than the mixed gender pairs about their finished product. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N